11/19/2023 0 Comments Linux picasa alternative![]() I think people have trouble with this concept because they liken OS X to Linux and Windows while there’s really no analogy to be made between Microsoft, Apple, and Linus/GNU. They won’t be offended if all you do is admire from afar. Maybe you’re not convinced, but Apple is already turning a profit without your help. The fact is, OS X and iLife are good/desirable enough to make people buy a $1000+ computer just to use them. Whether programmers on the teams want to release their creations into the wild, and whether people who visit OSNews desperately want to play with the OS without buying a Mac, is meaningless. The software divisions only exist to support hardware sales. Export of thumnails to web page could be quite nice. Right now we use EOG or GTKam, and those work fine too. Probably not a lot better than the other free Linux apps, but quite nice. Sadly for Apple, they win every time, and they cripple the OS and the Applications divisions in the process. The hardware people at Apple say, I want there to be some reason why people have to buy my expensive hardware. The applications division will want to sell as many copies as possible and to hell with OS restrictions. The OS division will want to sell as many copies as possible and to hell with hardware restrictions. Generally speaking there is tension between the OS division, the hardware division, and the application division. Stop trying to make people buy hardware and an OS they evidently do not want, in order to get applications they might want if they could run them. What Apple should do is sell iWorks and iLife for other operating systems. Would you be consistent and say that your old CPU is better than whatever new super CPU is released in the future because you would have to buy a new motherboard to use it, and you have serveral perfectly good motherboards already? ![]() If you are happy with what you have, don’t have the money, or are just too cheap to buy something new, then thats all fine and dandy, but using that as an argument as to why the alternative is not better just makes you look silly. See that would be perfectly ok, i know that I certainly wouldn’t buy a new computer just to run iPhoto. This would assume that you actually tried out both programs in order to make a judgement, of course if you haven’t your oppinion on the matter isn’t terribly useful in the first place.Ģ) I think iPhoto is a better program than Picassa, BUT not so much that i want to buy a new computer to run it. I think the conclusion you should have made would be one of the following:ġ) I think Picassa is a better program than iPhoto Bull, whatever or not you can run it has nothing to do with the quality of the program.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |